Archive for February, 2008

The Experience Trap

Wednesday, February 27th, 2008

Often we see individuals trapped in their past experience. They want to change jobs but don’t have the “relevant” experience. Recruiters and managers don’t like taking risks and often prefer to hire someone who is not only a high performer, but also has relevant experience.

trap For years, research has shown that past experience is a poor predictor of future performance, yet a recent article describes how “Conventional wisdom holds that as we do more things more often, we learn from experience and get better and better. What we found in our research is that this may not always be the case.

Why? “Managers don’t get the right feedback.”
So what does one do? If you are a manager, find a definitive way to get candid feedback. Checkster’s 360 checkup has been designed with this in mind.
If you want to change careers? It is usually harder. Our best advice is that you should try to move within your organization first, if possible, because lateral moves are easier!

Employment reference check questions: What can we learn?

Thursday, February 21st, 2008

Today, about 95 percent of companies perform reference checks. Reference checking is a current practice in the world of employment, but is often poorly performed. Not only is the process rushed and utilizes a limited amount of references, but recruiting and hiring managers don’t ask the right questions. These two issues are really at the core of what constitutes a quality employment reference check: good questions and the right people as employment references.
At Checkster we looked at these factors and created a free report that is available here and covers the best questions to ask and the best process to use.

A sample pdf questionnaire download is available here.

Employment Reference Check questions Dilbert ChecksterThe important question that remains for the job seeker is: What is there to learn from a traditional reference check? The answer to this is nothing.
At Checkster we are changing this by providing a reference checking tool that not only automates the process for recruiters, but also gives candidates a copy of the report so they can learn about their past performance.
The right career is found by knowing yourself and knowing how you did in your previous job, yet feedback is not used often in today’s world. We want to make sure that companies get better employees and individuals find careers that are aligned with their core talents!
That is what Checkster stands for!

Talent on Demand

Monday, February 18th, 2008

Peter Cappelli is releasing his new book in a couple of weeks on the state of the talent management industry. He will be presenting a new model for talent that impacts organizations, employees, job seekers, coaches, counselors and anyone involved in the world of talent. We can already see his view in action in many organizations today.
Cappelli’s approach borrows from the principle of the supply chain and the manufacturing just-in-time revolution, but changes the language from an engineering certainty to a market-based approach with intrinsic uncertainty.Cappelli

This new workplace dynamic revolves around 4 principles:
1. Make and buy talent: Internal talent development is still the preferred method as it is the cheapest and least disruptive for an organization. Yet, since the cost of unused inventory is a burden too heavy to carry, companies need to undershoot what their talent predictions are. Why undershoot? Because we have to accept the imprecise nature of talent forecasting.
2. Reduce uncertainty in Talent Demand: We have to accept the imprecise nature of talent prediction at its essence. Instead of going after the highly specialized developmental programs, we’re looking at providing training, tools, and framework that can apply to large employee populations and not small sections of your organization. We like this one, as it is exactly what Checkster is providing—a tool that helps all individuals grow!
3. Earn your ROI when you develop employees: Employees will have to share the cost of training, by either investing more of their personal time for training, or paying off the training investment if they leave. Note that new employers hiring employees could pick up the tab, making the reluctance or current training investment disappear. We like this one very much, as it is for the good of all parties!
4. Balance Employer/Employee interest: The internal job market within organizations places career management in the hands of employees. That’s one very efficient way to make a market-like approach to career evolution. Plus, it enables others to access a new realm of possibilities without being stopped by a rigid deterministic system. The only element that could stop us: our ability to produce results!

Order your copy of the book here.

When It Comes to Interviewing Women, Men Can Be Stupid

Wednesday, February 6th, 2008

Can the attractiveness of an individual impact your judgment? What if Mr. or Ms. Universe came for an interview in your office? Would it lead to the same outcome as that of an average looking person?

You will see in this article how face to face interactions can lead to “stupid” decisions by highlighting research that proves what we suspected all along: in front of an attractive woman, men on average are prone to making more stupid decisions!

Not surprise,… See our full article here.